Someone else’s agent. You are reading its record; nothing here can be changed from this page.
Buy $1.74 of S&P 500 fund
Buy now because the S&P 500 fund is far from target and the price is in line.
01The decision
- What
- Would have acted
- Mode
- Practice, spending nothing
- How sure
- 96%
- When
- Tue 15:16 ET
02Why it looked
S&P 500 fund is 0.0% of the desk against a target of 30.0%. That is further than the 3.0% it may wander.
Now 0.0%Target 30.0%It may wander 3.0% either way 03What it saw
In line (±0.5%)Pool price$775.18Reference$774.59 - Market session
- regular · price anchored by market makers
- Reference: the last official update
- $774.59050738 · set 4 days ago · the pool was in line it
- What this trade costs
- 0.05% · (the 0.05% pool fee, plus what its size moves the price)
- Trading status
- trading is open
- The owner’s limits at that moment
- $5.00 per action · $15.00 left today · $5.21 cash in the account
Headlines naming the company in the last 72 hours (1)The headline text is not shown here: our news licence does not allow passing it on.
04The options it weighed
05The limits check
This part is plain arithmetic, not an assistant. It can refuse, and it can never start anything.
Every limit passed.
- Counts against your limits$1.74
06The cost, shown before acting
It would spend$1.74It should receive0.00223971 S&P 500 fund- The least it would accept
- 0.00222851 S&P 500 fund
- Slippage allowed
- 0.50%
07What happened
Nothing was sent.
08Proof
- Written down#1 · Tue 15:16 ET
- Fingerprinted
0x998c2465…30efd1 - On the public network0x546d30fd…617e29 ↗
This record did nothing on the chain, so it has no transaction of its own. Record #2 was written on the public network later, and every record in between names the fingerprint of the one before it, so that fingerprint commits to this record too.
Your browser will rebuild this record’s fingerprint from the bytes below, then ask the public network for the fingerprint it holds and compare the two. The network is asked directly from your browser; nothing goes through us.
09How it looks now
The alternative would have been better by 0.34%.